Find a Lawyer

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus SULEMAN KHAN

With regard to acquisition of land acquisition act 1894 S54, the court increased the prices of land acquired on the approval of the landlord's petitions while the appeal against the increase in the price filed by the federal government upheld the appeal of the civil court. Has been requested to keep. The Land Acquisition Collector was not an independent order but merely an alternative order, under which the Land Acquisition Collector's Award was replaced by a civil court order, which then became the Land Award in which the Land Award was received. And it didn't. Except that it should be challenged by a party who has been explicitly given the right to appeal, the party was not explicitly given this right, there was no locus standi to file an appeal like this. No right can be assumed on any basis. It should be used only if it has not been explicitly given to a party by a provincial government nor a collector by law. An appeal is filed by the central government. The appeal was made - According to the proportion fixed by the Supreme Court in Pir Khan, there was no locus standi to file in it. The case was reported as PLD 1987 SC 485. criminal advocate from Kotri lawyer