GUL HAMAD versus ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P.HOME DEPARTMENT, PESHAWAR
NWFP Pre-Emission Act 1950 S 12 With the approval of the certifying authority of the Jirga Commissioner's recommendation of the Deputy Commissioner before the Civil Procedure (Special Provisions) Regulation, Provincial Provincial Regions Regulated, 1975, Section 12 plaintiff Prior notice was deleted. Under the provisions of the Code of Conduct, 1975, the Legislature of the Revision Authority had no authority to modify or designate a fact-finding tribunal, where such search commissioner It was accepted in the appeal, unless the authority's opinion was that there was material irregularity or defect in the proceedings or that such action was taken that the reviewing authority on the issue of misunderstanding of justice. Discussed the facts of the matter, which were explored in the two lower forums simultaneously. There is no irregularity or defect in the proceedings, nor the misunderstanding of justice in these proceedings under the Code of Conduct, 1975, the scope of jurisdiction is very limited, because the Commissioner's finding of fact was accepted. Then it could not be revised. Was not able to sustain the creation without any jurisdiction and lawful authority
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Head Marala lawyer