Find a Lawyer

MST. SAJIDA ALIAS ASMAT KIANI versus STATE

The termination of the FIR proceedings against Section 1 561A Panel Code (XLV of 60 of 60 of), Sections 202020, 8 petition8 and 1 471 applicant / accused was to tamper with the Computerized National Identity Card. Later changed his date of birth. The record shows that the applicant did not tamper with the computerized national ID card, it was a genuine and valid document. The applicant had neither prepared a false document nor tampered with any of the original documents, but his request for a change of date before NADRA's permission and computerization included a changed date of birth. The IC was issued, the applicant woman was dragged into unnecessary litigation for many years. She faced several years of investigative torture before the various investigating officers could not be allowed to proceed in pending litigation against the applicant, in the circumstances, because it would bring criminal justice against the woman. Is akin to abuse of process. High Court's inherent jurisdictional practice because they were persecuted for some kind of error, proceedings in the unknown FIR were terminated, in the circumstances famous supreme court advocate from Topi lawyer