Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 An applicant dismissed from employment on charges of defamation orders that the applicants were not given the opportunity to present testimony, the Inquiry Officer acted on the occasion and under pressure from the administration and applied for the petitioners. No other showcase notice was given on. On the basis of the fact that the inquiry officer had recorded the statements of the applicants in jail and no such petition was raised or any objection was raised against the appointment of the inquiry officer, nor the law for the issuance of the second showcase notice. There was no need. Was it withheld even when there was defensive evidence containing the documents that prevented the applicants from presenting or necessarily dragging them against the applicants?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
