MUHAMMAD NADEEM ALIAS NANNA ALIAS BILLA SHER versus STATE
Section 2 30b (b) The testimony of the testimony of the defendant, the victim's son, and other free-eyed witnesses confirmed each other in all material details; the witnesses made some minor contradictions in the statements of the minor There was no negative effect on the qualities. The prosecution's case was that the witness's presence at the scene was natural. Ocular testimony was unpredictable and credible, which was further corroborated by medical evidence regarding the time of its occurrence, the location of the injuries and the weapons used in the recovery of the knife in the crime. The suspect's example was proven, which was found by a serologist to stain human blood. Desdeus had suffered sixteen fatal wounds, indicating that the suspect had coldly killed her in the blood and evidence of the motive was provided with revenge for the incident. The prosecution and even its weaknesses or abilities did not present the mitigating circumstances for awarding the ng punishment and the death sentence for the perpetrators was retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Bhalwal lawyer