MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL versus STATE
Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 7777B bail, the dismissal of the Chemical Examiner's sodomy report was raised by the trial defendant accused of misappropriation of his validity of bail. Did not Possibility of positive reports and alleged misconduct by Medical Officer and Chemical Examiner, consisting of prosecution witnesses permanently endorsed by the prosecutor's story, the trial court's grant of bail was negligent, unwarranted and negligent. I was not misused to guarantee bail. Against this backdrop, less and more irrelevant ideas were made, which weighed in on the trial, which was approved by the trial court, which bailed the accused completely uncontested, and not just the section 497 in the bail order (1) In the cases that attracted the prohibition clause, the principles set out for the grant of bail were fought. ), The CRPC but also the trial court's minor acquittal of the trial court's rejection of the bail granted by the trial court was reversed and the accused was taken into custody \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Gakhar Mandi lawyer