A. VIII, R11 and Section 11 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Case for Trial Court Judgment, Principle of Rejection of Stable Arbitration Procedure by the Prosecutor to Reject the Claimant Applied that the plaintiff has no cause. The current process of filing a direct and substantive dispute in the arbitration proceeding was reviewed, with its partner and other material available on record sufficient to disprove the claimant's claim in his own power. This can be viewed for the purpose of rejection. The property dispute was concluded through an award which was ruled by the court with the consent of the parties and the matter was directly and substantially presented in a direct and substantive manner in the arbitration proceedings between the parties. Was. Under the Judicata Rule and prohibited under Section 42 of the Special Relief Act, as of 1877 the plaintiff had ceased to have any legal role or right in the property being prosecuted against the plaintiff in which the plaintiff had no right to prosecute The reason was not, oh VI, R 11, in any of the four cases mentioned in the CPC it should be rejected. The court rejects the claimant if the claimant is not entitled to relief if all the allegations leveled against it cannot be found, then the actual relief of the declaration cannot be obtained, nor in the present case can the resulting relief be granted to the claimant.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
