Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FAZAL MUHAMMAD DOMKI versus LUTUFULLAH


Section 526 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 337H (2), 148 and 149 Conviction AMD, racketeering or negligence act, mischief, joint reliance on trial judge's reliance on trial Accordingly, the allegations made in the transfer request were vague and general in nature. Such allegations could not have been the basis of the transfer. No specific date was mentioned by the applicant / accused on which the presiding officer complained to the accused. Was pressured to compromise the matter with the distributor. The presiding officer should also be protected equally from the request for illegal transfer to obtain a transparent settlement of the case for final arguments, unless routine or transferable to the parties' wishes. Ground not suitable and only self-reliance was taken, there was no scope for transfer of the case The transfer request was without merit, it was dismissed, in the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Kamokey lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.