KARIM DAD KHAN versus STATE
Defining the evidence of Sections 9 (c) and 9 (b), the defendant was arrested on the spot and his personal search yielded 1050 grams of heroin. The accused was also involved in many other cases of similar nature. The policemen had nothing. He was convicted of falsifying the accused with such a large quantity of intoxicants and justifying the challenge to the defense lawyer, who maintained that the quantity of heroin recovered from the accused was one. Kilograms, which he seems to have only been shown to have brought under the section 9 (c) of the Control of Narcotic Materials Stances Act 1997, otherwise amounting to one kilogram, under section 9 (b) of the said Act. For which the maximum sentence was seven years \ RI the death sentence of the accused was ten years. Lack \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Qasba Gujrat lawyer
