Find a Lawyer

KHURAM SHAHZAD versus STATE

Sections 2?2 (b), 7 377 and ??? ????? Definition of evidence, reduction of sentence, no background of hostility between the parties was available, therefore, the complainant did not designate the accused in the FIR prosecution evidence Was walking on a detour. Returning to the same cycle without a sack and sack on his career was enough to prove that unanimous evidence for the settlement was on record as he was carrying the child's body on a bicycle carrier. The accused identified him as his father's charity, where he threw the deceased's body and where the body was found, the accused admitted in his statement under Section 34342, CRPC, that the said cycle was his The High Court had granted bail after his arrest on the basis of appearing in the examination during which the accused was convicted, and he was convicted for three years. The statement made by the accused in his statement made under section 2 under under the CCP had rejected it as a matter of consideration by the trial court. There was no enmity with all the prosecution witnesses who found the deceased child's accused Annab stained with a chemical test. The prosecution had, therefore, proved against the accused that the prosecution's case was that on the day of the incident the age of the accused was less than 18 years with respect to Sections 299, 306 and 308, PPC shows that the accused. Has been sentenced to death. The adult, who was not an adult, was convicted under Section 2302 (b), but was sentenced to death as a result of PPC, leading to his life imprisonment. famous lower court advocate from Ghotki lawyer