Find a Lawyer

ATTA ULLAH versus STATE

Section (c) Four witnesses of the prosecution presented by the prosecution in support of the evidence supported the recovery of 3 kilograms of marijuana from the accused. It was not proved that the recovery of heirs / drugs from any of the suspects was not disclosed as to why the police would fake a huge quantity of marijuana to show their performance, which cost millions. Discrepancies have been identified in the case of Rs. According to the accused's lawyer, these people were so modest So the risk of a trial could not be considered, nor did they make the suspect's recovery possible, and such minor discrepancies, if any, were bound to happen over time, with 3kg of cannabis Recovery from the accused was proven, and the Chemical Examiner confirmed in its report that all the prosecutors had four permanent statements - ion witnesses, who were repeatedly trusted, as private witnesses, unless their If the person is not charged with any hostility or has no interest in falsely accusing the accused, There was no suspicion in May, relying solely on the statements of the prosecution witnesses for the decision to be found in the appellate trial court in the circumstances; Was sentenced as list of advocates from Tall lawyer