Find a Lawyer

JAVED AKHTAR versus STATE

At the time of taking advantage of the doubtfulness of the evidence 2302 (b) evidence, there were a number of situations in which the presence of eyewitnesses on the occasion was quite suspicious that the complainant and other prosecution witnesses were not only relevant and Interested witnesses, but there were also witnesses of the occasion who failed to present a plausible explanation for their presence at the relevant place at the relevant time, which the parties, which were related to each other, were not aware of their ancestors. Civil litigation was closed on the issue of inheritance. The property In addition, witnesses can be interpreted in the context of tension, bitterness and tension, with the accused's father on the one hand and some close relatives of the eyewitness on the other, in various murder cases. Or non-eyed eyewitnesses who were witnesses of the occasion, can only be trusted by the court when they are satisfied the court did not say on the reason for their presence on the occasion and otherwise, but in the present case, The witnesses could not provide a compelling reason for their presence on the occasion, medical evidence denied the FIR instead of providing assistance to the ocular account, the medical evidence presented was in fact the prosecutor denied the eyewitness testimony and Submitted his claim to testify to the incident, and the motive for further suspicion established by the prosecution The cooler was far from being established and objective account of the alleged pistol was unable to retrieve any kind of remedy. During the investigation, five bullets from the possession of the accused were legally unforgettable as they were allegedly recovered from the accused. advocate for immigration from Mansehra lawyer