Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SARDAR versus STATE

Definition of section 320 evidence was alleged in the FIR along with its tractor number, the names of witnesses were also mentioned in the FIR, there is no background of enmity between the parties. There was an eyewitness, though the victim's brother, was not an interesting witness. Since there was no enmity with his accused. The other eyewitness had nothing to do with the defendant nor the complainant. The accused confessed to his presence on the spot during the trial, but there was little difference that the tractor was driven by someone else and he was sitting. Midguard at the time of the incident, but did not provide any such explanation in its statement under Section 342, CCPC was not presented by the driver's license during the investigation or before the trial court. Meaning he didn't have it. The driver's death was not denied by accident due to any driving license, failure to postmortem did not harm the prosecution's case. The negligence and speeding of a tractor killed a teenager and four unlicensed courts did not give any valid reasons for sentencing less than four years. The RI suspect was awarded maximum punishment and His sentence was extended to ten years in circumstances under RI. r \ n advocate for immigration from North Wazirstan lawyer