Find a Lawyer

TARIQ SHAHBAZ versus CHAIRMAN, NAB

Section 9 (A) and 16 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appointment Bail, Applicant's refusal to delay the trial's conclusion was that he had been in jail for the last five years and the result of the trial was not ? The foreseeable future is near, while according to Section 16 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, the trial should be held before the Accountability Court within thirty days, the applicant's lawyer was not present in the trial court or he was about 52 52 Was not available on occasion. Were the applicants who, despite the occasion, sought the prosecution that the witnesses of the prosecution were present on the occasion, could not in the circumstances claim that the trial provided for under Section 16 of the National Accountability Ordinance was not within the prescribed time frame? However, the applicants could not claim. Bail due to their own conduct, in which the first party showed that the email was rejected at the end of the trial itself \ r \ n immigration advocate from Swat lawyer