Find a Lawyer

TANVIR ALIAS TANOO versus STATE

The complainant's refusal to injure two arms with sections 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), sections 324, 337 A (ii), 337 F (v) and 337 L (ii), 148 and 149 bail. , Which were debates and the FIR itself showed that the accused and the co-accused had simultaneously patented the complainant with their respective weapons because the complainant had stolen his buffalo on the accused's offer. The case was registered and the other accused were named. The FIR and simply because the offense did not fall under the Prohibited Clause of Section 497, the CCPC accused was not entitled to bail because he and the co-accused had brutally beat the complainant and his face. And there are numerous wounds on the body, including the head guarantee. In the circumstances, dismissed immigration advocates email from Phagwar lawyer