Find a Lawyer

ZAHID JAMEEL versus S.H.O.

Section 6406 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 575 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The constitutional petition that rejected the complaint, sold the furnace oil to the accused and then provided it with manual labor. I had no relationship with the facilitator and support. There is no clear or definitive agreement between the complainant and the defendant for a particular purpose of furnace oil between the seller (the complainant) and the buyer (the accused), so the complainant has banned the accused from using the furnace oil. Was not applied. His factory had a complaint till his payment of the price, so it was alleged that the accused had used the furnace oil sold illegally, he was charged if the FIR was charged. So, vague and common allegations will be divorced. Threats, however, were fully believed even when it appeared that this was a pure civil dispute between the seller and the buyer, with the alleged allegedly sale price of furnace oil allegedly being used by the latter police station as such. There was no forum to resolve the dispute if it was admitted that the accused did not pay the price of furnace oil purchased by him, yet there was no crime against him but in the recent past the civil court A dangerous civil court's verdict of a competent hearing by a special court to ensure the dangerous trend of civil court Had to get the money before the case against the accused to the complainant. Such a trend should be avoided in the hands of the criminal law, otherwise the police are unnecessary. jobs for advocates from Mirpur Khas lawyer