TARIQ SHAHBAZ versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Article 9 (A), 18 (G) and 24 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The second reference, the qualification of the charges against the applicants, who were already detained and in the custody of the National Accountability Bureau. That 400 Pakistani nationals through their money exchanges and 18 million Saudi riyals were invested and financed through fraud and fraud, and checks and drafts of U-section dollars were issued in lieu of money received. , But he said that the checks were not honored by the banks due to insufficient checks. After proper investigation into the funds in the applicant's account, a reference was filed against the applicant, which was pending in the accountability court, reference to the adjournment, another reference was also filed against the applicant. That the reference was not made to any law later. Violations of authority, fundamental rights and constitutional guarantees were against double jeopardy, as the applicants were already citing accountability, leading the accountants to run illegal money exchanges in large numbers in front of their company in Pakistan. The source was invited to send his money, later / another referral was a misuse of the law process. The difference between the amount and the amount deposited in the depositors and the people who have deposited the above amount, will not constitute separate offenses, nor can separate reference be filed through subsequent inquiry, coming later. The reference, at most, can be declared supplementary to one already filed by the Special Prosecutor NAB
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Dadu lawyer