MAQSOOD AHMAD ALIAS RANA versus STATE
Section 497 Grievance Regulation (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 guarantee, FIR contents at relevant times and grants related to the conduct of the accused, did not occur as the complainant prosecutor advised. Was. Although witnesses from Vaj Tucker, belonging to the same village, disclosed the tip after more than seven weeks without explaining their long silence on the matter, it is alleged that they were residents of the same village. That is, the suspects who failed to identify the complainant made no sense, especially when the FIR did not say that the accused had strangled his face at the time of the incident, thus, further investigation. In the circle of the accused, the role of the accused was similar to that. In the case of a co-accused who had already been granted bail by the High Court, the accused was allowed to bail in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Shadiwal lawyer