MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus ATTA MUHAMMAD
Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 42 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 18 Determination of allegations of allegations of allegiance together with the brother Brother Plaintiff Courts in 1964 Was assassinated, and he left his residence on the property under question and returned only in 1994. The plaintiff claimed to be the owner of the suit land and confirmed the change in the sale received in favor of the defendants as a result of the fraud. ????? The scope and appeal filed by the plaintiff were rejected when the tax record was included in the tax record, it would not waive the plaintiff's title or interest in the suit land and sell it to the defendant. The rejection of the fact will not be exempt from the fact that the parties were co-partners and that the record of illegal change in income could not constitute a limitation period against the plaintiffs' decisions and set aside the orders below the two courts. Was filed and sued in favor of the plaintiff's review of circumstances r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Rangoo lawyer