MST. AZIM BIBI versus RASHIDA BEGUM
In section Q 42 of the Law of Martyrdom (of 1984 of 10), the plaintiff's plaintiff was accused of fraudulent litigation for sale on behalf of the plaintiff. She was taken to the hospital, where some of her papers received the impression of her thumb, which later proved to be a controversial cell-death lawsuit claiming that she did not claim to be a "parda" observing woman. He himself has claimed that he does not have the free will of any male member of his family. The fraud was completely eliminated by the plaintiffs that it never made a thumb impression on a document, in such circumstances the sole responsibility for the execution of the execution of the contents, contents and cell deed was transferred to the defendant. Cannot be avoided because the great grounds of alleged fraud cannot be excluded. The plaintiff himself, by presenting the testimony of the defendant, proved the payment to the Registrar for consideration of the sale and the sale deed suit was dismissed under circumstances \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Fateh Jang lawyer