Find a Lawyer

THE STATE THROUGH PROSECUTOR-GENERAL ACCOUNTABILITY, NAB, ISLAMABAD versus BABAR ALI KHARAL

The rules of procedure for freezing sections 12 and 32 of the property were appealed to the High Court against the judgment passed by the Accountability Court in which the application for the return of vehicles and jewelery, etc., was accepted. The National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, provides for the restoration of property-related matters, the substantial and exhaustive provisions of self-law that freeze / confiscate, attach, attach, etc., the property of the NAB to the accused or any of its parties. And give you the option to The Syed administration, however, seized its relatives, associates, or individuals, however, imposed certain restrictions on scrutiny and balance to prevent abuse of authority and it was mandatory if the NAB authorities Through which any property has been frozen / confiscated. In order to freeze / seize the same thing, Chairman NAB had to issue an order, which was not present in the case, even if the order of capture / freeze, attachment or prohibition was approved by Chairman NAB. Implementation will continue. Unless the court has confirmed the matter unless a reference has been sent against the accused, but in the present case, it was not confirmed by the NAB authorities regarding the aforesaid claim / confiscation by the relevant court that the respondent. Was to retain the property of. Absolute violations of Section 12 (iv) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, because at the discretion of the NAB authorities, it cannot be excluded that they can choose accordingly. Wish any clause of a law and apply it for your own benefit or to prevent a person from owning it. famous supreme court advocate from Padidan lawyer