GHULAM SHABBIR ALIAS BAKRA versus STATE
Section 497 (2) The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11 Bail, Grant of Further Investigation, with the alleged kidnapping of the accused with the alleged kidnapping of Zina The statement was not charged. Section 161, CRPC, stated that the co-accused had actually provoked him and the accused was sitting on the other side of the road. That she was sitting with the accused and the co-accused attempted to commit adultery with her and it was alleged that the co-accused stopped her from doing what the alleged kidnappers allegedly improved during the trial. Will see it in the trial court. At the end of the trial, which contradicts his statement to the police under Section 161, the CRPC was able to deal with further inquiries for the time being, there was no basis to halt the trial. When the bail was brought under section 497 (2), a further inquiry into the accused's case was sought, the CCP suspect was admitted to bail, under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Daska lawyer