SIKANDAR MUMTAZ versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, GUJRAT
Section 141414 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Bail application, was granted to the applicant against the submission of the bond of car seizure guarantee on bail, on the direction of the applicant, in preparation of the car. Failure, it was stolen and he filed an FIR under which the trial court confiscated the surety bond, which was upheld by the appellate court, and the applicant will hear the case before the court. And when it was needed but the applicant failed to present the same criminal case. A case was registered against the applicant under Section 6406, PPC Petitioner, the case was registered that his car was stolen, an order was issued verifying that the applicant was found to be fake, The behavior did not allow anyone. A gentle look and he did not deserve any extraordinary relief, as he did not deposit a genuine guarantee bond at the time of taking the car on Superddy. Failure to present the car before the court, the applicant's surety bond was properly seized as it was bound to make similar preparations under the condition of the name Superdy while the applications were dismissed under the circumstances. Was
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
