RIZWAN AHMAD versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Proposals, Sections 9 and 18 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 25 Objectives of the Constitution Petition and Objections of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, the applicant allegedly disconnected from the complainant for the restoration of the power connection. There was a raid on demand of Rs 50,000 to be made. The applicant, who was allegedly stabbed with a smear money, remained on physical remand and was subsequently sent to a judicial lockup by the Administrative Judge of the Accountability Court, the petitioner submitted that the NAB. Authorities are not capable of conducting raids in this case, which fell exclusively within the domain of the Anti-Corruption Authority and stated that the objectives and objectives of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, were the main purpose of the issuance of the National Accountability Ordinance. Corruption has to be rooted in the government departments of the vast. Corruption in public offices, especially in the country, and NAB officials in the country, have examined cases of high-level corruption and other laws, such as the Anti-Corruption Laws and Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1958, from public offices. Was not canceled and remained in custody, and the special courts said that the law was doing too much with investigative staff, etc. The Chairman NAB or any of its representatives is not authorized to elect to file a reference against anyone under the provisions of the National Accountability Ordinance. , 1999 Since NAB officials did not have absolute or arbitrary discrimination in dealing with arbitrary citizens, the issue could not be allowed by government officials to remain in opposition to the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Sukkur lawyer