HAJI SHEIKH ZAHEER AHMAD versus CH. MUHAMMAD ANWAR
On challenging decisions and decrees relating to the provisions of Sections 12 (2) and 115 of the fraud and misrepresentation, the plaintiff appealed to the court that the trial court and the appellant to request an injunction for a trial hearing. The defendants of the court had filed an application under section 12 (2), keeping in view the CPC decision and the decree that the defendant had contracted the sale in favor of the defendants. Compromised, prepayments were made and property was also seized, the agreement stated that the record would be given at the time of document registration of the documents prepared on the record, the property-related case was pending. In a civil court and the order was issued and the plaintiff was therefore unable to execute the contract of settlement, provided that the plaintiff decided to sue, he would receive the defendant's money with the Probation Note. Will return This amount was hanged by the defendants by the plaintiff for the sale process and its registration and final transfer in favor of the applicants, could only have occurred if the decision was taken in favor of the plaintiff. The agreement was a complete disclosure and further terms between the parties as a result of the case P. On the termination of the case in any way, the High Court refused to interfere with the review.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
