MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE)
Article 199 Constitution Petition Extra Charge Scope Grant Cancellation Applicants request cancellation of a land grant in favor of the defendant, but the District Officer (Revenue) has the additional charge of the Executive District Officer (Revenue). The petition filed by the applicants was dismissed. By the District Officer (Revenue), the Office of the Executive District Officer (Revenue) cannot, in any way, alter the legal status that the Executive District Officer (Revenue) was the District Officer's Appellate Authority (Revenue). The scope of the Executive District Officer (Revenue) Although the matter was never pending before the Executive District Officer (Revenue), it was pending before the District Officer (Revenue) that the order passed against the applicants was anything but unjust. And had no legal consequences. Two offices, even if permitted by law, still cannot be used by the authority to frustrate the law or take away the rights of the affected party, which could lead to a higher forum that was otherwise legally constituted. The High Court obtained the remand of the matter, pending the question and allowed the application under it.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
