Find a Lawyer

SHAH NAWAZ BHATTI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, HEALTH/CHAIRMAN, PROVINCIAL QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, GOVERNMENT

Section 11 (5) (b), 11 (5) (e) and 31 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 204 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Case / Crime Not Applicable to Applicants During the trial, which was filed by the authorities in the Drug Court, the Drug Court also arrested the applicants as the petitioner raised that only the Provincial Quality Control Board was responsible for the offense under the Drug Act, 1976. The authority to detect the names of individuals was given. Sessions, for the purpose of acquiring powers exercised by the original jurisdiction and for the hearing of the Code of Conduct by the Criminal Code, 1898, for the trial of a summons as a Magistrate's Court, such as the Drugs Act Is considered under sections 31 (4) and (6). , 1976 If the court was of the opinion that there were grounds for action, it was empowered under Section 204, CR PC to review the criminal powers of the court under section 204, PCP non Were bound and the Drug Court was empowered by the Court of Session, and upon receiving the challan and seizing the case, such seal was extended not only to the accused persons against whom the challan was presented. But other people may be involved in which he could be charged with drugs. The court was able to pass the order, with the need to include the applicants initially found to be the accused, as accused, and there was no restriction on such court powers. The petition was dismissed. divorce advocates from Daharki lawyer