Find a Lawyer

IMTIAZ AHMAD ALIAS TAJI versus STATE

Section 302 (b) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), the reduction of sentence in Section 12 was alleged to have known the prosecution's witnesses, their identity is not in question. Standing clearly stated that witnesses testified to each other on all material details of the case, medical evidence fully supported the ocular version, which gave the natural, permanent and integrated dead man sixteen sharp weapons. There were injuries that could not have been caused by a single person. The prosecution's case will not be weakened by the absence of a knife from the Omar accused and the evidence of the recovery of arms on the offer of the co-accused. Both the accused were convicted under Section 302 (b), PPC maintained. The accused, who was allegedly 15 years old at the time of the incident, was enforced before the end of the age-old Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, the trial and the accused could not afford the benefits of the underage ordinance. Consequently, in view of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, the death sentence of the accused was changed to life imprisonment. Was gone The injury to the neck of the accused was specifically attributed to the minor. According to the prosecution's case, the co-accused was humiliated in the eyes of the fellow villagers due to the conduct of the victim, the death sentence of the co-accused was also reduced to life in the circumstances. family advocate from Kalam lawyer