Find a Lawyer

CHIEF ENGINEER, N.A. P.W.D. GILGIT versus LATE SHAHEEN KHAN, CONTRACTOR THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES

Issues in the application under Section 12 (2) and OVII, R 2 for the fraudulent and misrepresentation case under Section 12 (2), CPC, allegedly from the institution of this case or proceeding. It can also be taken as a defense in all the petitions and written statements relating to those that have come before. And the defendants had ample opportunity to lay the ground as the basis for the applicant's own defense ground, seemingly that the transactions between the parties seemed to be related to whether the applicants would want to reopen the matter. Which was finally resolved by the Council for Applicants. During the argument, it was pointed out that one of the respondents, in association with the other respondents, concealed the facts from the applicant, as the applicant failed to establish the basis of the matter before the court at the time of filing the written statement. ? For this reason it is not enough to attract the minds of ordinary people who stated that the defendants are applicants / employees of the department, enjoyed many responsible positions, sent some of them to the pension. Went to And while some applicants were enjoying their services in the department's council, during the arguments, one of the defendants made all the allegations of fraud and misrepresentation and said that he had made mistakes for his personal benefit. But the defendant was not the plaintiff. In the petition under section 12 (2), no decree was passed in favor of it; the CPC was dismissed under the circumstances. online advocate from Jamshoro lawyer