MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE NORTHERN AREAS THROUGH SECRETARY, KA/NA DIVISION GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Article 19A Police Rules, 1934, R12 2 (3) Promotion Petitioner, a Sub Inspector Police, said that they were ignored and discriminated against because they were not given timely due progress. They were entitled, under which the applicant objected that neither the applicant's service tribunal nor the principles of seniority were applied to the defendants' promotions before they failed to obtain relief from the Tribunal in 1974, However, an appeal was allowed before the Supreme Court of Pakistan and the inspector general of police was remanded to prepare the case. Was made peace. A seniority list after inviting objections from all officers. For that reason, the list of sanctuaries issued by the Inspector General of Police was challenged by one of the respondents before the Chief Secretary and the applicant was again resorted to a service tribunal before the order was finalized. It was not proved that the Supreme Court of Pakistan refused. Lack of jurisdiction enjoy the petition because civil courts were set up for civil affairs in the Northern Territories before the Chief Justice of the Northern Territory was dismissed, even though the Inspector-General on the directions of the Supreme Court. The sanitary list produced by the General Police could have been disturbed. The Chief Secretary was a controversial question when once a case was reopened on the direction of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, it was objected that the applicant had failed to challenge the respondent's sanity / promotions within the stipulated period. Applicants will be appointed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
