Find a Lawyer

RAJA ALI SHAH versus MUHAMMAD ALI KHAN

In section Q 42 of the Law of Martyrdom (of 1984 of 1984), the plaintiff's claim was that the Su100 Su suit for the plaintiffs was in the physical possession of the landowner's suit because the tenants who suspended the plaintiff's father. , Plaintiff alleged that after a pleasant relationship, his father attracted defendant's father, but defendant's father changed the disputed land in his name to fraud and the plaintiff's father's non. Variation in his name was confirmed in the presence and without his father's information. And the appellate court below dismissed the litigation claimants simultaneously, despite owning a very large and valuable property of the suit land, remained immunity and ineffective for decades, while the defendants and their forefathers sued. Make all the legal arrangements to keep your honor on the land. The fact is that the defendants were not in actual possession of the suit land, their ancestors received the lease-free tenancy of the Om suit land, while under the law, receiving the interim was considered a sign of ownership, if not otherwise. The agreement does not prove, on which both the courts below ruled, based on a verdict, which the plaintiffs faced fraud and refusing to execute the fake document, more than 30 years old. The plaintiff had failed to substantiate any fraud or fraud in the execution of the said document, while the alleged The burden of proof of fraud and forgery of documents was rejected on or has not been disputed, the courts had the right to rely on those documents as below advocates from Kamokey lawyer