Find a Lawyer

LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, ISLAMABAD-PESHAWAR MOTORWAY PROJECT, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD

Referring to Section 4, 11, 18, 23 and 54 compensation, the referee court appealed against the decision by the Land Acquisition Collector and the authority regarding the decision of the referee court's accuracy, while the amount of land compensation received. While determining, the court had to consider the evidence brought to the record by the parties for one year, as well as the prospects and future prospects of such land. On average, this should also be taken into account when determining the value of land acquired by the government, not only the previous sale should be taken into account, but other factors also determine the value of the land. Should be done by testing. Payments for acquired land, including the nature of the LA, should take into account a number of factors, including its current use and its capacity for high capacity, its exact location in relation to adjacent land, its neighboring land. Was used for use and the effects of such use on the acquired land were consistent with each aspect of the referee's court. Decided the case and the correct decision and presented a reasonable decision which could not be challenged by the referee court's finding on the basis of proper definition of law and facts; the appeal could not be interfered with. top advocate from Thul lawyer