SHAMSHAD IQBAL versus SHEHZAD KHAN
Articles 561A, 512 and 366 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), section 365A / 347 offenses against property (Enforcement Hoodoo) ordinance (VI of 1979), section 20 were filed against two accused, and one In their statements before the trial court, the complainant as well as the accused kidnapper was acquitted by the accused, the other accused in the case was released, who was absconding and also absent. Was acquitted, yet the alleged kidnapper was charged with indictment, operating in accordance with section 121212 CCPC. Mjha was, that in the case of fugitives, although section 6666 may not be the law of Cr PC case, said the court hearing. In the absence of either party, any decision rendered by a criminal court should be annulled, but since a fugitive accused was deemed to be above the law, in practice and some of his usual practice, given by concrete law. Deprivation of rights, if allowed to implement such a policy of decision-making, especially in criminal cases, will not only prevent the investigating agency from questioning the accused for going to Scotland. Independent, but would also encourage criminals to escape the clutches of the law and the courts, and the text and texts of the unwanted verdict meant that neither the complainant nor the state prosecutor in the trial against the fugitive accused Was heard from. To the extent of the fugitive accused and the case was remanded in the trial court, which was followed by a hearing from the applicant and the State Council.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Silanwala lawyer