His widow's complainant filed a section 493, 512 and 439 law marriages (10 of 1984), arts 150 and 151 panel codes (XLV of 1860), declaring section 302 witnesses as honorable murders. His statement was also filed under Section 51212, CRPC, but the complainant's brother Brother, who was a witness to the accused, narrated a completely different story as the prosecution's witness. , Who applied to the trial court to declare the winning / opposing witness a complainant. The trial court rejected the petition sought by the prosecution for its cross-examination by the court, the petitioner filed a review petition against the same scope on which the public prosecutor prosecuted the prosecution in the criminal case. That is, in the present case, do not request the trial court to dismiss the complainant / prosecutor's testimony as admissible when it has been examined and examined, the applicant / deceased brother's statement to the complainant. The same was filed in the next court and the applicant accepted the complaint on the same day Did not move to imitate. She examined Madonna and Cross, but after three months she moved the petition from applicant / b The victim's anger was only a witness and he was not one of the victim's legal heirs, according to Islamic law his widow and Applicants did not have a Lux Standby in the presence of children so that they could allow the complainant to cross-examine. Discretion of the grant trial court granting permission of the widow of the deceased, 1984, according to Arts 150 and 151 of the law testimony
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
