Find a Lawyer

LIAQ ZAMAN versus FAZAL RAHMAN

A. VIII, R2Auths Act (X of 1873), Sections 9 and 10 of the Constitution of the Constitution (10 of 1984), Article 163 Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Decision on the Claimant of the Trial for the Receipt of Money Submission of the judgment case For the adjudication of the affidavit, however, the plaintiff's offer was denied and requested that the plaintiff be asked to prove his case, the trial court accepted the plaintiff's request and the injunction The plaintiff was allowed to take an oath from the Holy Quran. Defendant's review of the trial decision states that Defendant filed the Constitution of the Validity Rights Act, 1873, provided that the offer and its approval were necessary and that they were related to the oath. The relevant components of this decision were, while Article 163 Canaan Evidence, 1984, assumed that when the plaintiff took an oath in support of his claim, the court, at the request of the plaintiff, would demand that the defendant respond to the oath. Defendant's refusal to offer affidavit case for denial of claim, court upholds defendant's claim Given the evidence should be asked to join, but the court did not take the oath and given instead to the claimant. On the Qur'an, which was not otherwise valid under the Shariah combination order of the following two courts, was set aside and the cases were remanded to the trial court for good judgment. family advocate from Dudial lawyer