SIFAT AIZDI versus DR. SAIMA BASHIR
Article, Schedule [as amended by the Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance, (LV of 2002]] Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Constitutional application for the retrieval of Art 199 Constitution The jurisdiction of the plaintiff was married And the cash settlement was fixed at Rs 60,000 by the Cabinet, of which Rs 50,000 was immediately paid to the claimant of Dover and half of the Rs 10,000 to the claimant in lieu of the remaining amount. After the transfer was made, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit. After the partition of the house, he was obliged to move half of the house which he had been given by a cabinet suit, on the grounds that the family court had no jurisdiction in this matter, The idea was that under Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, the Family Court, 1964, had full jurisdiction to dispose of all the marital disputes listed in the Schedule attached to the Act, which did not involve a probe division. Wife is granted rty for damages. Once the property is immovable or immovable, the husband has betrayed the wife, the family has exclusive jurisdiction under section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. ? The fundamental changes brought about by the amendment of the Family Courts Act through the Amendment Ordinance of 2002 increased the scope of the schedule associated with the Family Courts Act. And even claims can be made for the recovery of the personal belongings of the wife, and the family court's argument can be relied on that the family court lacks jurisdiction to pass the suit house's decision. Things were stopped
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Ukba lawyer