UMAR KHITAAB versus STATE
Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 452/34, denied the complainant, although he did not see the accused with his own eyes while firing at the victim, but did not see the accused and his accomplices at home. Was seen running away The statement of the prosecution witness was also endorsed under Security 161, CCPC, who stated that she was in the courtyard of her home when three armed men entered the house and entered the room. After which the firing took place. Made in the yard and then they all fled the house. And when she came out of the room, the victim was killed, the prosecution's version received support for the medical examination of the deceased, according to which the casualty was killed by fireworks and a temporary review of the above facts and circumstances. To the extent the accused is charged with a crime that falls under the prohibition clause of section 497, the CRPC has banned him from granting bail privileges.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Ukba lawyer
