Find a Lawyer

BACHA-UD-DIN versus GOVERNMENT THROUGH COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, PESHAWAR

Sections 2017, 16, 168 and 169 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act (XNXX of 1950), Section 3 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Sections 523 and 550 of Pakistan (1973), Article i99 Constitutional plea for sale of vehicles by auctioning a vehicle, on suspicion of being involved in the commission of this crime, was detained and confiscated, which claimed the legal import of the vehicle, and Requested his release on tax payment, which was accepted and the customs department owed to pay the fines and duties of exemptions and taxes. Yagi was ordered to release the vehicle, during which time, the vehicle was already auctioned, which angered the applicant, who accused the applicant of constitutional filing that the vehicle was The auction was made in illegal haste and no information. The auction customs department denied the allegations before it was given to the applicant and emphasized that the record through post evidence registered with the notification under section 2012 of the Customs Act, 1969, has proved that the Customs Act, 1969 Under the section 2012, the applicant was given notice regarding the sale / auction of the Department of Customs Department, in which case, there could be no violation of any provision of the Customs Act 1969. The constitutional application was dismissed, however, since the applicant was allowed to redeem the vehicle on payment of the ransom, in addition to the taxes and duties imposed on it, he was required by law to sell the department's income. Was entitled to receive. advocates from Usta Mohammad lawyer