Find a Lawyer

GHULAM QASIM versus STATE

In section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, further inquiry complainant's grant, in its first report, no one was designated to commit any crime nor was any motive given. The complainant only heard from the mouth of the co-accused that in the dark hours of the night two victims were killed by some unknown person. The complainant remained silent for a month and eight days after the incident and after that he was accused of the crime. Accused of the allegations and did not disclose the source of the information by which he came. Learn about his involvement in the crime, and no reason was given as to why he had been a mother for so long. In addition, neither of these two accused had been assigned any specific role in the incident, when no trial was yet to be heard when supportive and contradictory evidence would come on the record as to whether the accused could be reasonably commissioned. Was related to or not. The crime case came under further scrutiny, whereby he became entitled to privileges on bail. criminal advocate from Malakand lawyer