HAYATULLAH versus SAMIULLAH
Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), application for the cancellation of section 324/34, had to lay a solid foundation for the cancellation of the bail, in the present case the complainant had to be alone with four persons. Was charged. Through the trial court, the accused of the firearm company had already been released on bail and the accused's role was similar to that of the accused, the case of the accused was investigated and they were entitled to bail privileges, the disputed order was based on correct premises. , Was not warrant interference by the High Court bail cancellation request, was excluded under these circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Rajanpur lawyer