Find a Lawyer

AURANGZEB versus STATE

Sections 516A & 561A Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Application of the Arts 3/4 Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 and 33 of the Cushion of Order Petition, Supply of Bus, The petition filed by the applicant under Section 1 561A, CRPC, had requested the trial court to rescind the order passed under which the bus was pending hearing of the bus involved in the criminal case. The trial court was dismissed prior to the seizure, requiring the issuance of notice under Section 33 of the Controller Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, to the applicant / owner, who has not issued so much The petitioner had no affiliation with the commission of the crime and the trial court granted the petition by the trial court behind Maxim's back. Under the law that no one should be heard who was good in the judicial system, the trial court overruled it, terminating the unclean order of confiscation of the bus and c. According to the law, a special judge / trial court was remanded for this decision best advocate from Qazi Ahmed lawyer