Find a Lawyer

ANJUM JILANI versus MST. FEROZA JILANI

The complainant's version of the definition of Sections 3 (2) and 7 (3) evidence that he was forcibly evicted by the accused, who was his step-son, was supported by the prosecution's witnesses, There had been cross-examination for a long time, but nothing. The version given by the complainant was squeezed in their mouth to scatter. It has been alleged that the provisions of the Illegal Settlement Act 2005 do not apply to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there were no provisions of the Act. Applies to land grabbers and the land mafia, but its legal acquisition also applies to the forced possession of a person from the trial court, in which case the defendant is properly punished under section 3 of the Unlawful Disposition Act 2005 Was sentenced and fined as an accused. Taking the law into his own hands and forcing a widow out of her home, no mitigating circumstance should be taken into account. During the trial, the trial proceeded in a trial, both illegally and without justification, which was not in accordance with the principles established by the justice, which allowed the accused to release the trial. With the exception of, was withdrawn. famous high court advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer