UMAR QIAZ KHAN versus STATE
The release of the motor car on Section 516A Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Explosives Act (VII 1908), Section 3/4 guarantees that the applicant was the legitimate owner of the motorist who was the taxi driver. Used to run He was the driver and on the day of the incident, an unidentified man, the accused, was held in the possession of the accused, in connection with the same alleged restoration of the contents of the explosives, not the motorist's secret in the petition question. From the caves. Applicant's valid documents, namely registration book etc. Applicants, in these circumstances, are entitled to have the motorist in custody; no competing claimant was present in the car, the car in question was parked under the open sky. Is responsible for victimization. The vehicle was full and the vehicle was not needed for the investigation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Ghotki lawyer