SHAKIL KHAN versus STATE
In seizing the cases of Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 324/34 of the Bail, Principles further grant arrest, the courts had to see whether the accused was guilty of the crime Whether or not there is a reasonable basis for believing. There was no need to delve deeper into the details of the case with him or otherwise and the details of the evidence did not need to go into the details because he could not be guaranteed at the bail-out stage even though he was convicted of killing the victim. Was nominated directly by the complainant for, but it was equally true that the investigating officer found both the accused innocent because of Alibi's request when Alibi's plea was lifted at the earliest possible stage of the incident. And some of the material on the record was aided by that, keeping in mind the guarantee phase too In that case, the two accused initially requested Alibi at the earliest possible time, which was investigated by the investigating officer. With the help of independent witnesses' statements and documentary evidence and after confirming that they were found innocent when taken together and temporarily assessed, the case of the accused person was further investigated and out of bounds. Took it Section 497, CCP deems them entitled to bail privileges, accused are admitted to bail, under conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Ghuzdar lawyer