UMER AFROZ KHAN ALIAS AFROZ KHAN versus AURANGZEB
Sections 497 (2) and 498 Offenses of Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 5/16 bail, no further investigation grant nor any alleged prior marriage of the co-accused was proved with any other person There was no evidence on record that Rakshti had no record of adultery with the accomplices, but according to the statement of the co-accused, he did so with the accused at his own will. Had a marriage contract and as his parents were going to marry him with a man he did not like, he customized the marriage contract with the accused. Was married and two daughters were born to the marriage, which data available on the record made the matter a further investigation. The bail was ordered to be released, the participant confirmed the approved interim pre-arrest bail and was ordered by the prosecution to join the investigation when needed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Sikandarabad lawyer
