Section 42 Transfer of Property Act (I82 of I82), Section 554 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Sections 17, 18 and 25 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 2020 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) ) The suit for sale was executed by the plaintiff after challenging the validity of the sale process for more than 15 years, including that of his mother, the plaintiff, who for over 15 years, Evidence The plaintiff's own brother was available in a transaction with her husband and a shopkeeper to the extent of 1 / 3rd share that was his own original mother if any fraud was to be committed, the mother as a seller On Should not have been shown and his real brother did not even enter into a valid transaction with the claimant as a minor witness to the sale agreement. , She did not sleep on the matter for such a long period. The suit is expected to be banned when the plaintiff Infect considered the suit property and there was no fraud or misrepresentation. Under the circumstances d \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
