Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD KHAN versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT

Sections 3 and 10 of the Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal Act (XII of 1991), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Permanent Retirement Appellant from the service of exchange of fines for which a disciplinary action was taken. On the basis of mismanagement and negative comments in his annual secret report, he was dismissed, inquired against the appellant and the Inquiry Officer confirmed some of the allegations leveled against him. The competent authority ordered the appellant to be dismissed and to file an appeal against the judgment. The competent authority, the service tribunal, appealed the question of justifying the termination of employment from employment to a mandatory retirement, questions raised in Article 1212 of the Constitution Service Tribunal concerning the law of public importance. Did not raise specific questions. Critical evidence to convict any appellant and con-appellant of misconduct, but because of his judicial misconduct, lack of conduct, irregularities, and criminal judicial officer, he was found to have committed a legal defect or record Did not suffer from a false statement and was fully authorized. There is no specific question of the law of public importance and there is no scope for interference with the exercise of jurisdiction, the authority to properly verify, modify, vary and modify the quantum of punishment. After that, both appeals were dropped. By the Supreme Court immigration advocates from Panjan Kisan lawyer