Find a Lawyer

ZAHEER AHMAD ALIAS KALA versus STATE

Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Re-review of Evidence Medical Evidence Determination of Post-mortem Report The witness's relationship with the deceased was a widespread incident, on the road near shops and residents. It was The housing incident was immediately reported to the police, different roles of the two accused were described in detail, both the accused were given the use of different types of firearms by witnesses, the trial court sentenced both the accused to death and the accused. Was sentenced. It was established by the High Court that the accused had raised the question that it was night time as the matter in the stomach, intestines and bladder did not support at that time due to the stomach digested food. Presence, colorectal and urinary tract matter do not necessarily conclude that it was nighttime or an incident occurred just before 9am; it was dependent on the deceased. Was at the time of eating and drinking liquid, of which no evidence was available on record, only the suspicion at the time of the incident took place. Cannot be doubted, eyewitnesses remain steadfast in their detailed search cross-examination, which could not. Only because they were suspected because of their relationship with the victim, if the witnesses or the complainant were not present on the spot, they could not explain the two types of weapons, which was established later when Post-mortem trial followed. Also, the High Court believes that all the witnesses are witnesses and the Supreme Court has found no reason to deny them. jobs for advocates from Dunyapur lawyer