Find a Lawyer

AGHA MUZAMIL KHAN versus CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, LAHORE

Before the Appeals to the High Court Intra Court of Appeals for Section 3 and 10 of the Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Article 3 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, the High Court granted the land purchased by the non-Muslim by means of the registered authors and Custodian confirmed the decree. Based on such a sale agreement in Jamabandi in 1948, was obtained by the applicants in the year 1949 60 60 The applicants are seeking approval for change of inheritance and in exchange for entries and entries in such Jamabandi. But want to add their name to the Revenue Record. Refusing to approve a change of inheritance from the Consolidation Officer during the proceedings of the consolidation, the constitutional application for the rejection of the constitutional petition will instruct the hearing officer to dismiss the constitutional application and the intra-court appeal of the High Court's Single Bench and the High Court, respectively. The division is justified by the bench. It cannot be combined with vacant land for separate purposes and for stability purposes. The consolidation officer acted illegally by refusing to include entries in the petitioner - the property was named after the owner. But the revenue record cannot be a new entry in the disputed area during the stabilization process. Substitution was not subject to the scheme The Revenue Officer's order was not protected by the challenge during the reinforcement process. If the High Court, including the High Court, may exercise jurisdiction in relation to the right to finalize a person's stability plan, then the appeal will not be obtained without confirmation of the stability plan. By the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, 1960 law firms from Turbat lawyer