Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMED versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM, MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE & CO. (REGD.) AND OTHERS

Sections 42 and 54 of the West Pakistan Land Reform Regulations, 1959 (MLR No. 64), para 27 Land Reform Regulations, 1972 (MLR No. 115), paras 26 and 32 (2) (d) of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act ( XVII of 1967), Section 163 West Pakistan Land Reform Rules, 1959, R11 Punjab Land Reform Rules, 1972, R12 suit declaration and sale of land sale mutual vendor for permanent order restraint, alleging such authority When Wendy was not the owner in the village vendor as a MLR No. of 64, she filed a lawsuit, but withdrew and refused. Variations filed a request for review, the district collector Wendy accepted the order imposed as a collector without the party's suit. The trial court and the appellate court rejected, but the High Court's order in reviewing the vendor sold the suit for consideration for valuable consideration, and then it was the seller's signature that was made by the vendor and commented on it. Had no legal right to do so. The filing of such application for review of the cancellation of the changes in favor of e-vendors, etc., was prohibited by the seller's agreement, which maintained the sale when thereby challenging such sales. The case was overturned by the West Pakistan Land Reform Regulations, 1959 and the Land Reform Regulations. In 1972, no forum was provided for a private person to examine the validity of a private stranger and to make a request for a reduction in proposed living or economic holding, a suit not approved by the Land Reform Authorities. Mutants solicitors from Daud Khel lawyer